Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05607
Original file (BC 2012 05607.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05607

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election 
for spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit 
Plan (RCSBP).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was not married when he made his SBP election in February 
2009.  He married in August 2009.  It was not until September 
2012 that he realized he needed to address adding his spouse to 
his SBP.  He was not aware he needed to request to add her to 
his SBP within one-year following their marriage.  

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 11 February 2009, the applicant elected Option A (Decline to 
make an election until age 60) under the RCSBP.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  Under Title 10 USC, Section 
1448(a)(5)(B), a service member must submit a signed written 
election within one year after the date of marriage.  The 
applicant married on 24 August 2009 and there is no evidence he 
submitted a request within one year following his marriage.  
There is no record the applicant contacted ARPC requesting to 
add his spouse to his RCSBP.


A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

He is currently an active member of the Wyoming Air National 
Guard (ANG).  In November 2012, he went to ARPC to inquire about 
adding his spouse to his RCSBP and was informed that she could 
not be added to the RCSBP due to the request not being initiated 
within one year following their marriage.  When he provided 
documents to have his spouse enrolled in Defense Enrollment 
Eligibility System (DEERS), he was not advised that he needed to 
initiate an election within one year of their marriage.  Had he 
been aware of the requirement to submit the request to add his 
spouse to his RCSBP within one-year of their marriage he would 
have done so.  

The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit D.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission, including his 
rebuttal response, in judging the merits of the case; however, 
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the 
basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim 
of an error or injustice.  While the applicant contends that he 
was not aware of his obligations regarding RCSBP with respect to 
his new spouse, he has not presented any evidence to indicate 
that he was somehow miscounseled or not provided a fair 
opportunity to make the requisite election within one year of 
his marriage as required by the governing statute.  We note the 
applicant will have the opportunity to make an election under 
the Survivor Benefit Program (SBP) when he turns 60 years old 
and begins collecting reserve retired pay and should avail 
himself of a duly appointed SBP counselor to ensure he 
understands his rights and obligations under the SBP.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence the applicant was treated 
differently than those similarly situated, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-05607 in Executive Session on 27 Sep 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Nov 12.
     Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 31 Jan 13.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Feb 13.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, dated 16 Feb 13, w/atchs.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02535

    Original file (BC-2011-02535.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In addition, the Board finds the evidence sufficient to give him the benefit of doubt in this matter as it does not appear reasonable that he would have knowingly elected not to elect this important benefit. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 17 February 2009, he elected spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01704

    Original file (BC-2013-01704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01704 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he made a timely election for spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05401

    Original file (BC 2012 05401.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant remembered to comply with the requirement when...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01862

    Original file (BC-2012-01862.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of DD Form 2656-10, Final Decree of Divorce, Domestic Relations Order [Military Retirement], letters from her attorney, letters from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and numerous other documents in support of her request. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 27 Jul 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the applicant and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05255

    Original file (BC-2011-05255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 Sep 2000, the applicant married; however, he did not request to update his RCSBP election within one year of his marriage. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03369

    Original file (BC-2012-03369.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03369 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he added his spouse to his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election instead of “Children Only.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03873

    Original file (BC-2012-03873.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating the applicant was notified of his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP on 6 August 2004 because he had completed the required years of service under the provisions of Title 10, USC...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02817

    Original file (BC 2013 02817.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating the applicant had one year from the date of his marriage to add his spouse to his RCSBP election. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00051

    Original file (BC 2014 00051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    STATEMENT OF FACTS: The RCSBP Information Package that was mailed to the applicant at his initial election point stated: “If you do not have a spouse or dependent children at the time you are entitled to make an RCSBP election, but later acquire a spouse or children, you may elect RCSBP coverage for that spouse or children within one year of acquisition.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial based on the applicant not making the update within one year of his marriage as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02001

    Original file (BC-2012-02001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. Further, although the law currently provides automatic coverage for a spouse if the member fails to provide coverage or the spouse does not agree with the decision, no such provisions existed at the time of the member’s eligibility to enroll in the program. ...